Friday, April 2, 2010

The Fear of Being Exposed Leaves Cazenovia High School Endangering Their Greatest Assets

Cazenovia High School has again excelled at their greatest talent: limiting students and promoting delinquents. Now this may sound harsh, but in reality, this is a softening of the truth. Many view Cazenovia High School as a shining beacon of accomplishment in academics, athletics, and community. In reality, each view is a façade that the school works hard to maintain. The rigid rules prevent independence and education, they only seem to bend for the athletically gifted, and prevent some of the schools greatest assets from succeeding.

Once, being a senior at this school was the epitome of high school achievement as seniors gained new privileges. Being a senior meant that students could obtain the ability to leave during study halls and lunch, earning independence and freedom. Unfortunately, the administration cowers at the possibility of a car accident on a lunch break, or a student skipping a class because they don’t wish to return to school. Now, seniors are only allowed to have late entry or early release if they are so lucky as to have their study halls fall at the beginning or end of the day. Leaving at lunch is forbidden, and seniors are provided with a far too small classroom where they can eat separate from the underclassmen. This action has limited those who will soon be leaving for college. Instead of gaining a taste of the responsibility that is necessary for college, students are coddled. In the fear that they will be injured or forget to check a watch, they’re kept inside the building, safe and sound. This inability of the administration to aid students will hinder them when they do venture to college.

The lack of any student e-mail prevents students from being comfortable with a system widely used at all colleges. Every college provides each of their students with an e-mail address. Notifications, events, dining hall hours, assignments, homework, and anything else are sent using these addresses. Without understanding this system in advance, arriving at college and relying on an e-mail instead of morning announcements is a slow transition for many. This lack of an e-mail further hinders the ability of Cazenovia students to succeed at college.

The school does make an attempt at improving student chances at college. They require a minimum of forty community service hours in order to graduate. While this may look impressive on a resume, in reality, this rule again undermines a student’s ability to cope. As they venture off into the world, these requirements of extra work will not exist. Instead of a young man or woman willing to do a little extra for good will, they see no requirement and therefore no need to go above and beyond. This attitude that is cultivated injures each and every student. Instead of learning to strive, they learn to just meet the lowest expectations.

The most recent of the limitations is in the form of students’ actual physical behavior that is completely voluntary: dancing. Following in their big brother’s footsteps, Fayetteville-Manlius High School system, the high school has chosen to ban any form of inappropriate dancing. In the principal’s words “no sexual bending” or “grinding of the genitals” will be allowed. The following dance was almost cancelled. Teachers did not wish to chaperone. They were afraid of being yelled at for their lack of severity in punishment or of the students hating them for following orders. A record breaking low of 144 students showed up for the following dance and most were kicked out or left before half the night had passed. This lack of attendance hurt student government and Academic Decathlon, who both use these dances for their main fundraising.

When the waltz first appeared, it was considered scandalous. Flappers, the jitterbug, Elvis Presley, and rock and roll were all met with the same reaction. Many students wish their administration would just get with the times and skip the “shocked” phase. FM ended most of their dances due to a lurking threat of a sexual harassment lawsuit. First of all, if a student was uncomfortable at a dance, then they can easily stay away from that crowd of people or the dance altogether. There is no requirement that students attend these dances. The likely reply to that statement is that students should be provided with a safe environment. The note that should be made, however, is that students willingly choose to go to dances knowing the risk. That being said, in Cazenovia, no such harassment issue exists. Every person chooses to dance as they see fit, and it was always up to individuals about how far they wished to go.

A simple solution to soothe the fear of lawsuit would be the obvious but bureaucratic move of parent permission and waivers. The school requires permission for just about any of the other school events; why not require it for dances? Parents could easily be notified of the situation and choose to allow or disallow their teen attending the dance. A simple waiver would protect the school from any lawsuits that could potentially, but not likely, exist. Also, for senior privileges, a waiver would be easy enough to ensure that if a student were injured, the school would be ineligible for the blame. This may seem callus and indifferent on the part of the school, but in reality the chances of an actual incident where these waivers were necessary are slim to none. These waivers would allow the school to provide its students with a chance at learning independence while removing their own liabilities in the matter.

Unfortunately, Cazenovia enforces rules in all the wrong areas, and ignores them in reference to the most blatant problem affecting Cazenovia teens: drinking. The town was recently hit with a tragic death of a girl a few months before she could graduate. Julia Parker died almost two years ago. Why? She and her friends were just about as drunk as anyone can possibly be without dying when their cabin went up in flames. Fortunately for the other intoxicated teens, they were able to wake up and escape. Julia was trapped and died. The aftermath of this event was quite tragic, but a note should be made. A few girls in that cabin were excellent athletes who had signed an athletic code of honor. They were not removed from their sports teams, suspended, or even noticeably reprimanded. How did this stricken and unpunished senior class respond to this tragedy? The night of the senior ball, many students showed up drunk to this school event. Throughout the years, the high school has made it their policy to not discipline those in violation of the athletic code of conduct, because then Cazenovia might not win their next game. The school and coaches must ask. What is more important; a game, or a life?

All of these rules prevent a student from learning independence, common sense, and responsibility. The steps the school has taken for improvement have turned out to be catalysts for degradation. The rules they do enforce limit growth and those they bend send the wrong message. In the end, the high school imagines itself to be the parent. The school board and administration do all they can to shape and guide each student’s moral compass and behavior, with their own interests often at heart of course. Should a group of a few elected and hired individuals have that much power over hundreds of children? Schools are attempting to control every action of their students. They turn a blind eye to obvious problems and encourage dependency on strict guidelines. When these students become adults, they only have the high school system to thank for their failures.

Sunday, October 18, 2009

Facebook

Facebook is an online time-wasting site. I love it, I go on every night and check various “apps” while I talk to friends online. Most people are familiar with Facebook; it simply displays information about you, pictures, your status, and more. Friends can go online to see what you’ve been up to and chat on Facebook’s instant messaging system. The interesting factor comes in when you realize that the internet is public, and anything you post on Facebook generally can become accessible to the public. What you write on someone’s “wall,” or the pictures you post, could possibly be seen by a teacher at school, a co-worker, your boss at work, and anyone else if they have the time and know-how to peruse the internet. Often what you post on Facebook isn’t offensive and you can’t find any serious fault in it. Also, if you’re careful, it is possible to make your profile and information fairly private. However, in that case of Dan Leone, he wasn’t careful enough.

Leone was an Eagles employee who was upset with the moving of his favorite player to another team. He made the mistake of venting about it in his Facebook status, and was fired for merely writing an insulting line. Now, a Facebook profile is a private thing and the only people you allow to see it should be your friends. Although who saw Leone’s status is unclear, obviously he was not careful enough to keep a moment of anger from reaching his boss.

A similar story occurred in London when James Brennan wrote ““F— the Partnership” as his Facebook status. His boss learned of it and he was immediately fired. Brennen’s comment on the situation is as follows:

"At the end of the day what I wrote was private. You would never get sacked for saying something like that in the pub. I was sacked from Waitrose for something I said on Facebook in my own time. The bosses only saw it because one of my colleagues grassed me up. They printed out a copy of the Facebook page to use as evidence against me. It is an infringement of my privacy."

Being fired for one sentence written in a moment of frustration is ridiculous.


Facebook is part of our semi-private lives. It’s like our diary. Facebook users can choose who may see their information and who can’t. That being said, many people are becoming quite proficient at “Facebook stalking.” Did you know that even if you’re not Facebook friends with someone, you can see a lot of their information if you are a friend of one of their friends? Confusing, yes, but it’s true. The fact that people take the time to check up on you, not as a good neighbor would, but a boss making sure everyone is being good little boys and girls borders on creepy and definitely crosses the line of personal space. So the statement I give is that a person should not lose their job for one small moment of misjudgement. They should lose their job for the fact that they weren’t competent enough to protect themselves from the scrutiny that brings about negative consequences.

Facebook should not be a competition of how many friends you can have, people should only “friend” those they know they can trust. Facebook has options that limit who can see your profile, personal information, pictures, wall posts, and your status. Everyone should use those options! If you know that you have inappropriate pictures on Facebook, if you know that sometimes you have crazy status messages, then do not “friend” your boss. Do not “friend” your principal or teacher or coach. With that in mind, try to refrain from even posting those pictures or that status message if you know that your profile isn’t secure.

Facebook is an amazing website, but it has been abused and its original purposes have been contorted. The website once reserved for college students only has exploded to become a global networking site where people feel the need to upload their entire lives. A simple word of advice; don’t. If you do, protect yourself and your information. I believe you’re not being fired or reprimanded or suspended for the information that you post, but for your inability to protect your own integrity.

Sources:
http://fifthdown.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/03/10/eagles-employee-fired-for-facebook-post/
http://racetalkblog.com/2008/06/30/employee-fired-for-facebook-comment/

Legalizing Prostitution

As long as I am with a consenting adult (or three) I have every right to have sex with whomever I choose under whatever circumstances I choose, as often as I choose and for whatever reasons I choose. Including transactionally. And so should you. Now, I am quoting someone from an online debate forum I discovered while researching the issue of legalizing prostitution, however I found that I agree with what they are saying. Many people are not so easy to win over.

So I suppose I have to touch on the religious issue first. That seems to be the preliminary step that everyone takes in most current debates. So I say that this is a country that practices freedom of religion, therefore, those who chose to not follow any specific religion should not be governed by the ideals a religion that they themselves don’t believe in. That removes the religious issues...

Often people might raise the objection that many women (and men, they’re a part of this industry as well) are forced into prostitution through their drug and/or alcohol abuse. The simple fact of the matter is that the problem there is the drugs and alcohol, not the prostitution, and that would lead into a whole different argument... but, as one source wrote: “Frankly, I would rather addicts be involved in the prostitution industry than say... armed robbery, wouldn’t you?”

Next I suppose we come to child prostitution. I believe a quote from a prostitute sums this one up nicely: “Child Prostitution- I don't even really accept this term, because sex with a child is child abuse and should not be referred to as prostitution. There are plenty of laws which prohibit abuse and exploitation of children, and no legal status for or against transactional sex will affect this.” The same would apply for sex slaves, as our constitution has anti-slavery amendments.

For that matter, wouldn’t the legalization of prostitution decrease the burden on police forces and jails? If transactional sex was no longer illegal, police forces could devote their time to ferrreting out those illegal sex slaves and abused children.

Well, if we were to move on to one of the biggest issues people seem to have with prostitution, we would be discussing the issue of the degradation of women. Interestingly enough, my peers didn’t even seem to think of that one when I surveyed multiple people as to their beliefs. So is suppose it must not be that important... but I’ll get into it anyways. How is choosing how to use your body, and often making quite a deal of money doing so, less degrading than a lifetime of flipping burgers? How many people work for the pure joy of it?
“If there wasn’t any economic compulsion, very few people would work. The prostitute makes exactly the same decision that the stockbroker makes: I need money, I have these marketable skills, and so I'll sell the exercise of my talents. Who is to say which person's decision to work is coerced and which person's isn't?”
Every job has some form of degradation attached. No one enjoys having a boss or someone in charge of you, so why is prostitution really all that different from any other job?

Another issue frequently brought up is the degradation of American society from what our forefathers originally intended. Keep in mind that at the birth of our nation, brothels were rampant. Thomas Jefferson himself had several relations, and children, with his African American slaves. Prostitution was only made illegal about 100 years ago, most states banned prostitution from around 1910-1915. That time period should look familiar, its about the same time prohibition came into being. Look at how well that went...

Now, if one moves onto looking at prostitution from the moral standpoint, let me first point out that often a sense of morality comes from the ten commandments and religious beliefs, and due to the founding principles of our country, those can no longer play an active role. People will often say “but it’s just wrong, sex is meant to be between two people who love each other.” Who says that is the way it’s meant to be? I want to see a constitutional amendment that states that sex is meant to be between two people who love each other.

If that was an amendment then I would say the majority of this country is in big trouble with the government...

I end with this:
“Whenever there is a demand for a thing, a market will be created for it- and one has to ask oneself- is it government's business to do anything more than regulate it for safety?” Governments would be able to gain tax revenue, test and regulate the spreading of STD’s, and in one night, remove an entire “criminal” industry from burdening jails and police forces.

Who are we to say what you can and cannot do with your own body when it harms none but the petty sensibilities of the self righteous?

Why should any consensual act between adults be criminal?

Source: http://www.americasdebate.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=10118